Legal Opinion

Temple v. Continental Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1958No. 40,573PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This action is brought by the landowners and other royalty owners to cancel an oil and gas lease as to a portion of a quarter section leasehold for violation of an implied covenant to develop. Defendants have appealed from a judgment in which they were allowed a period of four months from June 29, 1956, in which to commence the drilling of an oil and gas well on the ten-acre tract in question, or in the alternative that they surrender said tract to the plaintiffs.

On March 9, 1929, the then Owners executed a lease upon the Southwest…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Alford v. DennisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Meneley v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Fischer v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Zerbinos v. LewisAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Renner v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Taylor v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. State Oil & Gas Bd. v. Mississippi Min. & Roy. Own. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API