Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1943No. 35,749PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This was an action to cancel an oil and gas lease for *368violation of an implied covenant to develop, after expiration of the primary term. Plaintiff was owner, by purchase subsequent to the giving of the lease, of a portion of the tract covered by the lease. The appeal is by the lessee, defendant, from an order overruling its demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence. The question is whether plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to establish a right to cancellation.

On December 6, 1928, R. C. Gates and wife gave an oil and gas lease on three quarter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Greenwood v. Texas-Interstate Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Nigh v. HaasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Flight Concepts Ltd. Partnership v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  2. Renner v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Wagner v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Rush v. King Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Temple v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API