State v. Dunson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
The state appeals the district court’s dismissal of criminal charges against two defendants for lack of probable cause. Because the dismissals are based on the district court’s erroneous legal conclusion that probable cause is lacking solely because the alleged victims were identified in the complaints by their initials rather than their names, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
On March 23, 2009, respondents Richard Eugene Dunson and Cary Lee Morrison appeared separately before the district court for hearings on unrelated criminal complaints. In the probable-cause statements…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. KendellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. DiedrichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. David Ernest OsorioCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Dunson v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State of Minnesota v. Jeffery Dale TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.