State of Minnesota v. David Ernest Osorio
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
In this pretrial appeal, the state challenges the district court’s speedy-trial dismissal of two charges of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Because respondent’s constitutional right to a- speedy trial was not violated, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
In March 2007, the Mound Police Department began investigating an allegation that respondent David Ernest Osorio sexually assaulted his minor stepdaughter. N.O., Osorio’s wife and the alleged victim’s mother, reported ■ the allegation. Later that month, Mound Police Detective Nic-cum submitted the case to the Hennepin County…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. OsorioSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. OsorioSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017