Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. David Ernest Osorio

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 2015No. A15-921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARKIN, Judge.

In this pretrial appeal, the state challenges the district court’s speedy-trial dismissal of two charges of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Because respondent’s constitutional right to a- speedy trial was not violated, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

In March 2007, the Mound Police Department began investigating an allegation that respondent David Ernest Osorio sexually assaulted his minor stepdaughter. N.O., Osorio’s wife and the alleged victim’s mother, reported ■ the allegation. Later that month, Mound Police Detective Nic-cum submitted the case to the Hennepin County…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. OsorioSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. State v. OsorioSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API