Legal Opinion
Caserta v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 22, 1993No. 14606PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The certified issue of this appeal is: “When the actions of a zoning enforcement officer are reviewed by a zoning board of appeal, is the proper focus for subsequent judicial review the decision of the *82zoning enforcement officer or the decision of the zoning board of appeal?” Caserta v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 223 Conn. 922, 614 A.2d 820 (1992). The defendant, the Milford zoning board of appeals (board),1 appeals, upon our grant of certification; id.; from the judgment of the Appellate Court. The Appellate Court concluded that: (1) the trial court had applied the proper scope of review to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Parsons v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Connecticut Sand & Stone Corporation v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Leo Fedus & Sons Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Toffolon v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Conetta v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Komondy v. GiocoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Murphy v. New Milford Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.