Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 21, 2020No. 121040PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 121,040 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. QUINTON MOORE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A person's mention of his or her right to counsel during a law enforcement interview does not necessarily constitute invocation of that right. Invocation of the right to counsel must be unequivocal. 2. A district court judge does not err in refusing to give voluntary intoxication instructions on first-degree premeditated murder and intentional second-degree murder counts, when the evidence before the jury cannot support the defendant's impairment at the time…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  3. State v. ZongkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. State v. YoungerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API