State v. Moore
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 121,040 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. QUINTON MOORE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A person's mention of his or her right to counsel during a law enforcement interview does not necessarily constitute invocation of that right. Invocation of the right to counsel must be unequivocal. 2. A district court judge does not err in refusing to give voluntary intoxication instructions on first-degree premeditated murder and intentional second-degree murder counts, when the evidence before the jury cannot support the defendant's impairment at the time…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. ZongkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. YoungerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.