State v. Hillard
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,163 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JEFF HILLARD, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When reviewing a district court's ruling on a motion to suppress, this court applies a bifurcated standard of review—the district court's factual findings are reviewed for substantial competent evidence and the district court's legal conclusions are reviewed de novo. When material facts underlying defendant's claim are not disputed, the issue is a question of law over which an appellate court has unlimited review. 2. The Fourth Amendment to the United States…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. DotsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. FlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. UnionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.