State v. Zongker
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,449 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ADRIAN N. ZONGKER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. While the PIK instruction defining premeditation is generally sufficient, in cases involving a temporal question—and where the temporal intricacies embedded in the legal concept of premeditation may confuse the jury—additional instructional language defining premeditation is appropriate so long as it properly and fairly states the law and is not reasonably likely to mislead the jury. 2. A defendant meets the first prong of establishing prosecutorial…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re D.J.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2025
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.