Legal Opinion

State v. Watson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 23, 2021No. 118710PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,710 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JASMON DEVAR WATSON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. It is improper for a prosecutor to attempt to shift the burden of proof to the defendant, but prosecutors are granted wide latitude to address the arguments and weaknesses of the defense. 2. A prosecutor does not shift the burden of proof to the defendant by pointing out a lack of evidence to support a defense or to corroborate a defendant's argument regarding deficiencies in the State's case. Likewise, a prosecutor does not shift the burden of proof…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. State v. ToshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Jomo WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
  2. State v. GuebaraSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. State v. HilyardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  4. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. State v. PetersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API