Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 16, 2024No. 124223PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 124,223 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DARNELL D. COLEMAN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Premeditation includes both a temporal element (time) and a cognitive element (consideration). A prosecutor thus commits error during closing arguments by making statements that contradict or obfuscate the cognitive aspect of premeditation by saying premeditation only requires time. 2. Prosecutors err by arguing facts not in evidence. 3. Under the facts presented, a prosecutor did not err by downplaying a theory of defense because the prosecutor…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DotsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. State v. Alvarado-MerazSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API