Pike v. Psihogios
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This action was instituted to recover the purchase price of certain personal property sold by plaintiff to defendant, also to- foreclose a chattel mortgage given to plaintiff by defendant.. The defendant set up as a defense to said action certain so-called affirmative defenses and counterclaims. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff upon the two causes of action set out in his complaint, and the court also rendered judgment in favor of the defendant upon four of the counterclaims set out in his answer, and deducted the amount found due on these four counterclaims from the amount found…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barnum v. CochraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Nittler v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Glaser v. ShostackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Frier v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Scott v. MullinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.