Barnum v. Cochrane
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William .R Daingerfield, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action for damages for false and fraudulent representations hy which plaintiff was" induced to purchase a certain hotel property situated at Point Tiburón, in Marin County, alleged to consist of a hotel building and furniture and an eleven-year lease of the land on which the same was situated. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment for $1,450. Both defendants appeal from the judgment. The defendant McLeod also appeals from an order denying him a new trial.
The false and fraudulent representations complained of related to the character and profits of the hotel business…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jeffers v. Easton, Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Burt v. . DeweyNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Palmtag v. DoutrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Alden v. PryalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by5 opinions
- Courtney v. GordonMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Pike v. PsihogiosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Fissel v. MonroeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Wilson v. TihcheffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Rivera Maldonado v. Central Pasto Viejo Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1932