Legal Opinion

Nittler v. Continental Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1928No. Docket No. 6375PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs sued to recover damages for the breach of R.C. McKinney, a licensed real estate broker, and joined as a party defendant the Continental Casualty Company, the surety upon the bond of McKinney under the Real Estate Brokers' Act (Stats. 1919, p. 1252). The cause was consolidated for trial with that ofCarroll v. McKinney et al., an action brought to recover for a similar breach, and which upon the submission of this cause upon the appeal was dismissed upon the stipulation of the parties. The cause was tried before the court without a jury and judgment was rendered in favor of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weingast v. Rialto Pastry Shop, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Blumenthal v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Salisbury v. AlskogWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Mitchell v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Clark v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Legg v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident of OhamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Cohen v. ScolaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API