Legal Opinion

Hester v. Allgeier

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 19, 1981No. Appeal No. 80-535PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Patent Interferences (“board”) which awarded priority of count 2 to senior party Allgeier et al. (“Allgeier”). We vacate and remand.

BACKGROUND

Count 1

The applications in interference1 relate to central nervous system tranquilizers in a class known as triazolo benzodiazepines (“triazolos”). The generic triazolo known in the prior art is represented by the structural formula shown below:

H3C-C1 N

*514The interference was declared on only count l,2 drawn to a triazolo genus. The compounds of genus…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Application of Newsome W. GayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. In re GlassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. In re DaviesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. Application of Carl K. Stewart, Deceased, by Mabel R. Stewart, Administratrix, De Bonis NonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  5. In re SkollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stoudt v. GuggenheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  2. Hester v. AllgeierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  3. Tofe v. WinchellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API