Refractarios Monterrey, S.A. v. Ferro Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Baldwin, Judge.
This matter comes before the court on motions to dismiss by appellee, Ferro Corporation (“Ferro”), and appellee, the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “Commission”).
These motions urge that the court lacks jurisdiction to hear this *154appeal. The appeal is from the Commission’s refusal to review the Administrative Law Judge’s order that certain evidentiary matters in Investigation 337-TA-41 are to remain confidential under -a protective order, i.e., denying appellant’s Motion to Declassify. The investigation itself was terminated upon statutory disclaimer of all patent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Godtfredsen v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Import Motors Ltd. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Potomac Electric Power Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture v. U.S. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Viscofan, S.A. v. U.S. International Trade Commission, Union Carbide Corporation, and Teepak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- Swagway, LLC v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.