Legal Opinion
City of Chicago v. Prologis
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 6, 2008No. 1-07-0108PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE FITZGERALD SMITH
delivered the opinion of the court:
Although complexities relating to the expansion of O’Hare Airport figure in the background of this case, this appeal presents a single issue: whether compensation must be paid to holders of certain bonds. Defendant ProLogis, a Maryland real estate investment trust, f/k/a ProLogis Trust, f/k/a Security Capital Industrial Trust (defendant or ProLogis), owned property that included a redevelopment project area for which tax increment financing (TIF) bonds had been sold. After the plaintiff City of Chicago (plaintiff or the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Canel v. TopinkaIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Chicago v. PROLOGISIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Strauss v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- Strauss v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- City of Chicago v. PrologisIllinois Supreme Court · 2010