Legal Opinion

John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 6, 1933No. 32PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

This action was brought in the District Court for Idaho, under the Tucker Act, to recover a balance due on improvement district bonds issued by the village of American Falls, Idaho, for sidewalk and sewer construction. The theory of the petitioner, holder of- the securities, was that the liability of the United States arose out of its acquisition of land in the districts for the construction of the American Falls reservoir under the authority of the Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902 (c. 1093, 32 Stat. 388). The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a judgment in petitioner’s favor, and the case…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Van Brocklin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Tempel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Alabama v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Brown v. SllvertonOregon Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. City of Huntington, West VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Adaman Mutual Water Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API