City of Chicago v. PROLOGIS
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman
Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Thomas, Kilbride, Garman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.
Justice Burke took no part in the decision.
OPINION
The circuit court of Cook County denied defendant and intervening petitioners’ counterclaim for inverse condemnation. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court’s denial of the counterclaim (383 Ill. App. 3d 160), and we granted defendant and intervening petitioners’ leave to appeal. 210 Ill. 2d R. 315. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the appellate court.
BACKGROUND
In 1996, the Village of Bensenville…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Woods v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Dineen v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. Wilson & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hampton v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- Berry v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
- Illinois Transportation Trade Ass'n v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Super Mix of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- Berry v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.