Canel v. Topinka
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman
In this appeal, defendants argue that, pursuant to section 15 of the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act (765 ILCS 1025/15 (West 1998)), the state is entitled to retain dividends issued on shares of stock which were presumed abandoned and delivered to the state. Plaintiff argues the dividends are private property which must be returned to the property owner along with the shares of stock. The appellate court determined that the dividends were the private property of plaintiff, and remanded to the circuit court of Cook County for a determination of just compensation. 342 Ill. App. 3d…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bryson v. News America Publications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Marshall v. Burger King Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Tuite v. CorbittIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Alvarez v. PappasIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.