Legal Opinion
Hampton v. Gober
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided November 5, 1997No. 97-27PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Judge.
The appellant, Mark W. Hampton, appeals a December 18, 1996, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) which determined, inter alia, that the appellant’s claim for service connection for a left knee disorder was not well grounded. Record (R.) at 1-7. This appeal is timely, and the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). For the reasons that follow, the Court will reverse the decision of the BVA and remand the matter.
Under 38 U.S.C. § 5107(a), the appellant has the burden of submitting evidence sufficient to justify a belief that his claim of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Murphy v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Quarles v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Clyburn v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- Thomas G. Joyce v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
- Arthur D. Roebuck v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Cotant v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
- McCartt v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.