Legal Opinion

Quarles v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided August 19, 1992No. 90-858PublishedCited by 205 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINBERG, Associate Judge:

The pro se appellant, veteran James W. Quarles, challenges a July 6, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision denying him entitlement to an effective date prior to November 9, 1984, for an increase in the 20% service-connected disability rating he had received for “lumbo-sacral strain with degenerative joint disease”. James W. Quarles, BVA 90-22275 (July 6, 1990) [hereafter Quarles]. The Court holds that the Board’s conclusion that November 9, 1984, is the appropriate date for the assignment of a 20% disability rating was clearly erroneous, that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  3. Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  4. Fletcher v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  5. Schafrath v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by205 opinions

  1. Kutscherousky v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
  2. Stegall v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
  3. Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  4. Kay v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
  5. Fenderson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999

200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API