Legal Opinion

State v. Hanover

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1909No. 8375PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered May 1, 1909, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of practicing medicine without a license.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

The appellant was prosecuted under the provisions of § 8 of the act of 1890, relating to the practice of medicine and surgery. He was charged with practicing medicine without a license, and was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine. He appeals from that judgment.

The state has made no appearance in the case in this court. The information alleges that the act was committed on October 86, 1908, in King county. A trial was had in the month of April, 1909. A judgment was entered against appellant on May 1, 1909. Between the date when the offense is charged to have been committed and the date of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. OliverWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. State v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. LorenzyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. NewcombWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. HanlenWashington Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API