Legal Opinion

State v. Hanlen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1937No. 26615. Department OnePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of grand larceny by information alleging the ofíense to have been committed the 13th day of May, 1935. On December 2, 1935, he pleaded guilty to the charge. He made a motion in arrest of judgment on the ground that, since Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2281 [P. C. § 8716], (Laws of 1909, chapter 249, § 29, p. 897) providing for indeterminate sentences, was specifically repealed by § 9, chapter 114, Laws of 1935, p. 319, and since §2, p. 309 (Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 10249-2 [P. C. § 4503-32]), of the latter act is ex post facto with respect to the crime charged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. State v. FairWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. LorenzyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. NewcombWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. AmesWashington Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. FenterWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. HanlenWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. MehlhornWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. In Re RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API