Legal Opinion
State v. Kane
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 4, 2000No. 45176-6-IPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
5 P.3d 741 (2000)
101 Wash.App. 607
STATE of Washington, Appellant,
v.
David KANE, Respondent.
No. 45176-6-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
July 24, 2000.
As Amended August 4, 2000.
Brian Martin McDonald, William M. Berg, King County Deputy Pros. Atty's, Seattle, for Appellant.
Dana M. Nelson, Nielsen, Broman & Associates, Seattle, for Respondent.
BECKER, A.C.J.
A 1901 saving statute provides that a prosecution for a criminal offense must proceed under the criminal and penal statutes in effect at the time the offense was committed, unless the Legislature expresses a different intent in an…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2009
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.