Legal Opinion

State v. Lorenzy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1910No. 8657PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Joiner, J., entered November 16, 1909, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of conniving at the prostitution of defendant’s wife.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of conniving at the prostitution of his wife. The charge is laid under chapter 123, Laws 1903 (Rem. & Bal. Code, §§ 2902, 2903), and the first point made is that, the original law being repealed by the new criminal code, the conviction cannot be sustained. This assignment is disposed of by the following cases: State v. Newcomb, 58 Wash. 414, 109 Pac. 355; In re Newcomb, 56 Wash. 395, 105 Pac. 1042; State v. Hanover, 55 Wash. 403, 104 Pac. 624, 107 Pac. 388.

However, appellant contends that the general savings clause passed by the legislature at its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. In re NewcombWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. AkerWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. NewcombWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Marvin v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. GayWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. MannNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API