State v. Kane
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Becker, A.C.J.
A 1901 saving statute provides that a prosecution for a criminal offense must proceed under the criminal and penal statutes in effect at the time the offense was committed, unless the Legislature expresses a different intent in an amendatory or repealing act. Intending to increase the use of a treatment-oriented sentencing alternative for drug offenders, the Legislature amended the eligibility criteria with a statute that became effective on July 25, 1999. Because the 1999 amendment does not *609express legislative intent to avoid the presumption of the saving statute, its effect is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2009
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.