Legal Opinion

State v. Kane

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 24, 2000No. 45176-6-IPublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Becker, A.C.J.

A 1901 saving statute provides that a prosecution for a criminal offense must proceed under the criminal and penal statutes in effect at the time the offense was committed, unless the Legislature expresses a different intent in an amendatory or repealing act. Intending to increase the use of a treatment-oriented sentencing alternative for drug offenders, the Legislature amended the eligibility criteria with a statute that became effective on July 25, 1999. Because the 1999 amendment does not *609express legislative intent to avoid the presumption of the saving statute, its effect is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2009

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API