Legal Opinion

Scott v. Fruehauf Corporation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 6, 1990No. 23252PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Chief Justice:

This is a products liability case. The jury awarded respondent Scott $1,125,000 actual damages against appellant-respondent (Fruehauf) and respondent-appellant (Piedmont), and an additional $1,125,000 in punitive damages against Fruehauf alone. The jury found for Piedmont on its cross-claim against Fruehauf for indemnification. We affirm the damages award to Scott and reverse the judgment against Fruehauf on Piedmont’s crossclaim.

Scott was injured when he attempted to place a mounted wheel assembly on the axle of a trailer. The wheel rim and side ring explosively…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Addy v. BoltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  3. Powers v. TempleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  5. Stuck v. Pioneer Logging MacHinery, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. McCourt by and Through McCourt v. AbernathySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Vermeer Carolina's, Inc. v. Wood/Chuck Chipper Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. McGee v. Bruce Hospital SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Ecclesiastes Production Ministries v. Outparcel Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API