Legal Opinion
Griffin v. Van Norman
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided October 8, 1990No. 1553PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Acting Judge:
Robert T. Griffin and Teri D. Griffin (Home Buyers) initiated this action seeking actual and punitive damages for alleged fraudulent representations on the part of defendants Linda B. Van Norman (Home Seller) and Mack Gregory d/b/a Mack Gregory Pest Eliminators and Mack’s Pest Eliminators (Exterminator). The gravemen of the Home Buyers’ complaint is that both the Home Seller and the Exterminator falsely represented that a house purchased by them was free of termites and moisture damage.
The Exterminator filed a general denial. The Answer of the Home Seller is twofold.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Addy v. BoltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Stuck v. Pioneer Logging MacHinery, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- O'Neal v. Carolina Farm Supply of Johnston, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
- Hollifield v. KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Vermeer Carolina's, Inc. v. Wood/Chuck Chipper Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. WanzekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Brendle's Stores, Inc. v. OTRCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Otis Elevator, Inc. v. HARDIN CONST. CO. GROUPSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Ogden Plant Maintenance Co. of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.