Legal Opinion

Bell v. Clinton Oil Mill

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 19, 1924No. 11556PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action for $50,000 damages on account of an alleged slander uttered by one' Matthew, an agent of the defendant corporation to one Geiger, another em ployee of and concerning the plaintiff, who had been an employee also. The slanderous words set forth in the complaint were:

“You had better fell Bell that the amount due by him is going to be reported to the bonding company and that he had better pay it up at once.”

Matthew, who is also a defendant in the case, was produced as a witness for the plaintiff, and he testified that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Scott v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Macon Railway & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Hypes v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  5. Ward v. Pullman Car Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. South Carolina Insurance v. James C. Greene & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  3. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Utilities Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. MacKey v. FrazierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  5. JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API