Legal Opinion

Hockett v. City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 8, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4686PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

139 Ariz. 317 (1983)

678 P.2d 502

Margaret HOCKETT, Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF TUCSON, and James Raymond Ledwith and April Ledwith, Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

No. 2 CA-CIV 4686.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

December 8, 1983.

Review Denied March 20, 1984.

Messing & Glicksman, P.C. by Elliot Glicksman, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellee/cross-appellant.

Kimble, Gothreau, Ryan, Nelson & Cannon, P.C. by Michael J. Gothreau, Tucson, for defendants/appellants/cross-appellees.

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

Appellee was arrested by appellant James Ledwith, a Tucson police…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. WoolridgeArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Murphy v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Watzek v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gasho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Estate of Shumway v. GavetteArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Carl West v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Hansen v. Garcia, Fletcher, Lund and McVeanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API