Hansen v. Garcia, Fletcher, Lund and McVean
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
LACAGNINA, Judge.
James Hansen appeals from a summary judgment in favor of police officers Garcia, Fletcher, Lund, McVean and the Town of Superior, Arizona, on his claims against them for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, negligence and violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arguing the officers had no probable cause to believe he committed an offense and that where more than one inference can be drawn from the undisputed facts, the issue of probable cause is a jury question. We affirm.
FACTS
The Santillan brothers had been in a fight with others at Fernie’s Bar at about 1:24 a.m.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. PedersonArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Slade v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. IntognaArizona Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Spears v. Ariz. Bd. of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Donahoe v. ArpaioDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Glen Scotti v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Aguilar v. Drug Enforcement AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.