Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Garcia, Fletcher, Lund and McVean

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 1, 1985No. 2 CA-CIV 5403PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LACAGNINA, Judge.

James Hansen appeals from a summary judgment in favor of police officers Garcia, Fletcher, Lund, McVean and the Town of Superior, Arizona, on his claims against them for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, negligence and violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arguing the officers had no probable cause to believe he committed an offense and that where more than one inference can be drawn from the undisputed facts, the issue of probable cause is a jury question. We affirm.

FACTS

The Santillan brothers had been in a fight with others at Fernie’s Bar at about 1:24 a.m.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. PedersonArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Slade v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. IntognaArizona Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. Spears v. Ariz. Bd. of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  3. Donahoe v. ArpaioDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
  4. Glen Scotti v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Aguilar v. Drug Enforcement AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API