Turner Hydraulics, Inc. v. Susquehanna Construction Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This case involves an appeal from the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Turner Hydraulics, Inc., and against the defendant, Forbes Chevrolet, Inc. in the amount of $50,532.86 (plus interest). 1 We affirm.
On appeal, the defendant challenges the trial court’s refusal to enter judgment non obstante veredicto. Our sole duty in assessing such a claim is to decide whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, granting the verdict-winner the benefit of every favorable inference reasonably to be drawn from the evidence. Mike v. Borough of Aliquippa, 279…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mike v. Borough of AliquippaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Joyner v. Harleysville InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Edart Truck Rental Corp. v. B. Swirsky & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Smith v. KravitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Walton v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Atkinson v. HaugSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Washburn v. Northern Health Facilities, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Refuse Management Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Recycling & Transfer Systems Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- ADP, INC. v. Morrow Motors Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.