Legal Opinion

Turner Hydraulics, Inc. v. Susquehanna Construction Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1992No. 455PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This case involves an appeal from the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Turner Hydraulics, Inc., and against the defendant, Forbes Chevrolet, Inc. in the amount of $50,532.86 (plus interest). 1 We affirm.

On appeal, the defendant challenges the trial court’s refusal to enter judgment non obstante veredicto. Our sole duty in assessing such a claim is to decide whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, granting the verdict-winner the benefit of every favorable inference reasonably to be drawn from the evidence. Mike v. Borough of Aliquippa, 279…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Mike v. Borough of AliquippaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Joyner v. Harleysville InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Edart Truck Rental Corp. v. B. Swirsky & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Smith v. KravitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Walton v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Atkinson v. HaugSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Washburn v. Northern Health Facilities, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Refuse Management Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Recycling & Transfer Systems Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. ADP, INC. v. Morrow Motors Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API