Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kravitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1953No. Appeal, 195PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

Appellee obtained a jury verdict of $850 in this trespass action and appellant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. was overruled by the court below. Hence this appeal. In reviewing this case upon appellant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. the evidence must be considered in a light most favorable to appellee, the inferences which may be drawn from it must be taken as true, and all unfavorable testimony and inferences must be rejected. Bross v. Varner, 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 495, 498, 48 A. 2d 880. So considered, the evidence establishes that appellee, a guest of Mrs. Lillian Terrell,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayden v. Second Bank of AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Bouy v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Bross Et Vir v. VarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Rubin v. Girard Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Theakston Et Ux. v. Kaszak Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McDevitt v. Terminal Warehouse Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Turner Hydraulics, Inc. v. Susquehanna Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Lopez v. GukenbackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. Laniecki v. Polish Army Veterans Ass'n of Lucyan ChwalkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API