Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Haug

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 1993No. 02545PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

In the spring of 1984, appellant, Joseph B. Atkinson, Jr., became partners in an apartment complex known as Kings-bury with his friend and business associate, appellee, Daniel M. Haug, an associate attorney in appellee John T. Acton’s law firm, John T. Acton, P.C. (hereinafter, collectively, Acton). When the investment failed, in an attempt to recover his financial loss, appellant brought suit for misrepresentation and professional negligence against the appellees alleging Haug’s allegedly faulty business advice was offered within the scope of his employment thereby making…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warren B. Sheinkopf v. John K.P. Stone Iii, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Overly v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Aiello v. Ed Saxe Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Small v. Juniata CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Williams Controls, Inc. v. Parente, Randolph, Orlando, Carey & AssociatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Cost v. CostSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Yarnall v. Philadelphia School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API