Legal Opinion
Edart Truck Rental Corp. v. B. Swirsky & Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 4, 1990No. 8348PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment by the trial court awarding rental payments, finance charges and attorney’s fees to the plaintiff. The defendant claims that the trial court should' not have (1) found that the defendant’s employee had the apparent authority to bind the defendant to a rental agreement, (2) concluded that the plaintiff’s claims were not barred by equitable estoppel, (3) held that the small print format of the contract did not rise to the level of unconscionability, and (4) found, on the defendant’s counterclaim, that the defendant failed to prove a violation…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Ackerman v. Sobol Family Partnership, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Turner Hydraulics, Inc. v. Susquehanna Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- D'ANTUONO v. Service Road Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Family Financial Services, Inc. v. SpencerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.