Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Harleysville Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1990No. 02273PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

The single issue presented in this appeal is whether the “producer of record”, who processes an application for insurance for an insured pursuant to the Pennsylvania Assigned Risk Plan, may be deemed to have “apparent authority” to receive premium payments on behalf of the assigned insurance carrier. We hold that under the circumstances of this case, the producer was an agent of the assigned insurer for the purpose of collecting premiums. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the trial court.

The parties submitted an agreed upon statement of facts to the trial court, each…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Sands v. Granite Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Juarbe v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Breslin by Breslin v. RidarelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. TAYLOR v. CroweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Volunteer Fire Co. v. Hilltop Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Regis Insurance v. All American Rathskeller, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Turner Hydraulics, Inc. v. Susquehanna Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Atkinson v. HaugSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Refuse Management Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Recycling & Transfer Systems Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API