Maddox v. River & Sea Marine, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice Pro Tern.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an appeal from a superior court decision granting summary judgment to defendant River and Sea Marine, Inc. (River and Sea), and dismissing the negligence claim of plaintiff Jerry Maddox (Maddox). The case involves the scope of a seller’s duty to warn the purchaser of, or make safe, a chattel dangerous for its intended use. The dispute arose when Maddox injured his back while attempting to detach from his truck a boat and trailer purchased from River and Sea. Because we find that material issues of fact are in dispute concerning the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Barbara R. Gross v. Southern Railway Company, Nancy Ruth Canipelli v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Arctic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Raleigh, Schwarz & PowellAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Lynden Inc. v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Noffke v. PerezAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Philbin v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.