Legal Opinion

Philbin v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1999No. S-8573PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before he was paid, a contractor signed a release. The superior court held that the release barred his breach of contract action. Because the contractor raised genuine material fact disputes about the intended effect of the release, we reverse the summary judgment entered against him.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Joseph Philbin, doing business as Philbin Construction, entered into a written contract with the Matanuska-Susitna Borough on October 6, 1995 to supply, load, haul, and deliver approximately 9,250 cubic yards of crushed gravel.1 The gravel was to be…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Glamann v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Estate of Kim Ex Rel. Alexander v. CoxeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API