Legal Opinion

Federal Rubber Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

The appeal presents the question whether the claim of an injured employee for a permanent injury under the workmen’s compensation act who has been paid temporary compensation is barred by the six-year statute' of limitations., sub. (4), sec. 4222, the claim being a liability created by statute other than a penalty or forfeiture and no other limitation being prescribed.

So far as we have been able to discover, only two provisions for barring claims are contained in the workmen’s compensation act. One relates to. the compromise of claims and provides, that an application to review, set aside,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Utah Consol. Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Ehrhart v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Anderson v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Baur v. Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Autio v. Proksch Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Acme Body Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Buzzn v. Muncey Cartage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API