Legal Opinion

Acme Body Works v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1931PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed February 10, 1931:

Owen, J.

The Industrial Commission made an award of compensation in favor of Herman Koepsel and against the Acme Body Works and its insurance carrier the Travelers Insurance Company. The injury for which the award was made was industrial blindness of the left eye, which the Industrial Commission found to have resulted from an injury to the eye sustained by Koepsel while in the employ of the Acme Body Works June 23, 1920. It is contended by the appellants that the evidence does not support the finding that the industrial blindness resulted, from…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brown's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Esposito v. Marlin-Rockwell CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Baldwin v. ScullionWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API