Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Anderson v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1916No. Nos. 19,934—(260)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Upon the relation of A. A. Anderson this court granted its writ of cerMorari to review the judgment of the district court for Winona county, Granger, <7., in proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by relator, employee, against the Bay State Milling Company, employer.

1Opinion of the Court

Dibell, C.

■ This was a proceeding in the district court by A. A. Anderson under the Workmen’s Compensation Act against the General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Limited, the insurer of the Bay State Milling Company, his employer. There was judgment for the insurance company. The judgment is before us upon a writ of cerMorari issued on the relation of Anderson.

Anderson was in the employ of the Bay State Milling Company of Winona on April 11, 1914, and on that day was injured under circumstances giving him a right to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1913 (Laws…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carlson v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Wrightman v. Boone CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Duncan v. CobbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Eaton v. Supervisors of Manitowoc CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Allen v. Mottley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  2. Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Kozisek v. BrighamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Lovgren v. Peoples Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Federal Rubber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API