Legal Opinion

Ehrhart v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1916No. S. F. No. 7452. In BankPublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Samuel Knight, P. E. Boland, and James J. McKenna, for Petitioners.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Certiorari to review the proceedings of the Industrial Accident Commission upon the application of Joe Salvatore.

On March 24, 1914, Salvatore, who was employed by one Karl Ehrhart, was injured by the fall of a heavy timber. A bone of one of his legs was fractured and he also received a blow on the chest. No immediate disability resulted from the latter circumstance, and in considering the amount of compensation to be awarded the commissioners regarded only the injury to the leg..

Salvatore was in a hospital for eight or nine days immediately following the accident. He was then removed to his…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. Skelly Oil Co. v. StandleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Federal Rubber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Crabb v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API