Legal Opinion

Credits Commutation Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1903No. S.F. No. 3492PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Supersedeas against the Superior Court of San Diego County. E. S. Torrence, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an application for a writ of supersedeas. In the superior court of San Diego County, on July 7, 1897, an action was begun, entitled Free Gold Mining Co. v. James Spiers et al. Charles W. Pauly was appointed receiver, and on June 21, 1902, an order was duly and regularly made settling his account current as receiver, and directing him to pay out of the moneys in his hands, as such receiver, certain claims for expenses incurred by Isaac Trumbo, a former receiver in the action, amounting to over forty-nine thousand dollars. On October 10, 1902, the petitioner herein appeared and asked…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lang v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Voll v. HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. David & Son v. Hurgren & AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Fulton v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Elliott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API