Legal Opinion

Voll v. Hollis

California Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1882No. 6,868PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendants, and from an order denying a new trial, in the County Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Weight, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Thornton, J.:

This action is brought to recover possession of a lot in San Francisco. It was brought under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure contained in Chapter iv, Part III, Title III of that Code. The complaint contains two counts, one for a forcible entry and the other for a forcible detainer. The cause was tried by the Court without a jury, and judgment was rendered for defendants. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial, and on the third day of October,-1879, this motion was, on motion of defendants’ attorney, no one appearing for plaintiffs, dismissed for want of prosecution.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCauley v. WellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. People ex rel. Gault v. Van NostrandNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. Thompson v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Warden v. Mendocino CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Carter v. NewboldNew York Supreme Court · 1852

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lang v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Carteri v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API