Legal Opinion

Lang v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1886No. 11367PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Application for a writ of review. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, C. J.

The following statement of facts in this case is admitted to be true and correct:—

On January 9, 1882, Holcomb et al. brought an action in the Justice’s Court of the city and county of San Francisco against George Lang, the petitioner herein. He demurred to the complaint, and the demurer was sustained; the plaintiff declined to amend, and judgment final was entered on the demurrer, whereupon an appeal was prosecuted by the plaintiffs in said action to the *492Superior Court, and on the eighth day of May, 1882, said Superior Court (Judge Allen presiding) sustained the demurrer without leave to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coombs v. Hibberd.California Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Barron v. DelevalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. People v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Voll v. HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Gallardo v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Carpenter v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Svistunoff v. SvistunoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Burnham v. Spokane Mercantile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API