Legal Opinion

Clark v. Lambreth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1952No. 381PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Tbis is the pivotal question: Considering the evidence shown in the case on appeal contained in the record, in the light most favorable to plaintiff, is there sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury? The trial court did not consider it sufficient and, with his ruling, we agree.

This case is controlled by principles of intervening negligence applied in decisions of this Court in Smith v. Sink, 211 N.C. 725, 192 S.E. 108; Powers v. Sternberg, 213 N.C. 41, 195 S.E. 88; Butner v. Spease, 217 N.C. 82, 6 S.E. 2d 808.

In Smith v. Sink, supra, opinion by Stacy, C. J., it is stated that “In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Garner v. PittmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Godwin v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. McLaney v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Cronenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API