Legal Opinion

McLaney v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1953No. 666PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

The demurrer of the appellant, Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., presents the question as to whether or not the facts alleged in the complaint of plaintiff are sufficient to constitute a cause of action against them. For this purpose the truth of the allegations contained therein are admitted, and “ordinarily relevant inferences of fact necessarily deducib le there from are also admitted. But the principle does not extend to admissions of conclusions or inferences of law,” Ballinger v. Thomas, 195 N.C. 517, 142 S.E. 761. See also Bumgardner v. Fence Company, ante, 698, and cases there cited.

Also,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Meyer v. McCARLEY AND COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Potter v. Frosty Morn Meats, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Troxler v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Hollifield v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API