Legal Opinion
Cronenberg v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided August 18, 1954No. 442 & 443PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILLIAM, District Judge.
These cases were consolidated for trial and heard without a jury.
No. 442 is an action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq., to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, Fritz Cronenberg, Jr., which resulted from a collision on the night of March 25, 1953, between an Oldsmobile being driven by a minor, Douglas Hunt, and a stalled mobile Highway Post Office, owned and operated by the Government.
No. 443 is an action brought also under the Tort Claims Act by the guardian ad litem of Paul Bulluek, Jr. for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- HAHN v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
- Joseph A. D'AmbrA v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Coastal States Gas Producing Company v. LockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Isgett v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
- McNeill v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.