Legal Opinion

Choctaw & Chickasaw Nations v. Seay

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1956No. 5284PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

The Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations brought this action to quiet the title to certain lands extending from the medial or center line of Red River and the southern or right-hand bank of such river and lying opposite Lot 1 of Section 10 and Lots 3, 4 and 5 of Section 3, all in Township 7 South, Range 5 West, Jefferson County, Oklahoma.

The Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations claim title to all of the lands between the medial line and the south or right bank of Red River, extending from the 98th meridian east to the boundary line between Arkansas and Oklahoma.

Seay, a defendant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Whitaker v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Hardin v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Victor Fontenelle v. Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  2. Cherokee Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Bauman v. Choctaw-Chickasaw NationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. Stone v. McFarlinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. SeayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API