Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Choctaw-Chickasaw Nations

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1964No. 7512PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal grows out of a condemnation action brought by the United States to acquire land for the Eufaula Dam and Reservoir Project in Oklahoma. The issues have been reduced to whether appellant Bauman, as trustee, or appellee Choctaw-Chickasaw Nations own Tract L-1240. We are concerned with lands in Sections 20 and 29 which the Canadian River,1 a non-navigable stream,- has crossed in various meandering channels during the last 60-70 years.

*787The government brought action No. 4737 to condemn Tract L-1229 which includes all the South Half, and a narrow strip of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Stockley v. CissnaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  3. Goins v. MerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Choctaw & Chickasaw Nations v. SeayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. Buchheit v. GlascoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Omaha Indian Tribe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. Olsen v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. Trustees of the Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Golden Nugget, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1988
  5. Housing Authority v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API